![]() (Core obfuscation is just some renaming - so the control flow is still fully available.) Or you want the IL modified further so that the code cannot be read any longer and that makes sure that people cannot look at the code easily. So you might want to have stringsĮncrypted. ![]() Net Reactor in the past which has an affordable price and offers a lot of features that I thought are important (and are not part of obfuscation). That is an easy way to see, which feature you might miss. If you think about using the Dotfuscator then just check the homepage of it to compare the different editions available. Maybe that new feature already offers enough options. Instead you might want to check the new possibilities to compile code to native binaries (.Net Native): In my eyes you really have to think about the pros and cons - and my decision was in the past, that we do not do any obfuscation at all. The big question is, what you want to do and what you expect of the obfuscation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |